| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Quebec (Attorney General) v. Canadian Owners and Pilots Association ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Quebec (AG) v Canadian Owners and Pilots Assn
''Quebec (AG) v Canadian Owners and Pilots Assn'', 2010 SCC 39, () 2 SCR 536, also referred to as ''Quebec v. COPA'', is a leading case of the Supreme Court of Canada on determining the applicability of the doctrines of interjurisdictional immunity and federal paramountcy in Canadian constitutional law.
==The facts==
An aerodrome, registered under the federal ''Aeronautics Act'', was constructed on land zoned as agricultural in the province of Quebec. Section 26 of the Quebec ''Act respecting the preservation of agricultural land and agricultural activities'' (“ARPALAA”) prohibited the use of lots in a designated agricultural region for any purpose other than agriculture, subject to prior authorization by the ''Commission de protection du territoire agricole du Québec''.
Since the Commission’s permission was not obtained prior to constructing the aerodrome, the Commission ordered the return of the land to its original state pursuant to the ARPALAA. The Commission’s decision was challenged on the ground that aeronautics is within federal jurisdiction.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Quebec (AG) v Canadian Owners and Pilots Assn」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|